Make Money Here

Friday 24 April 2015

PICTURE: Buhari New Government Brims Over Highest Quality Electric Train Concept For Niger

In this picture, incoming Nigerian president General Muhammadu Buhari, APC chairman Oyegun and others are seen brimming over what appears to be a plan to introduce the best quality electric trains int he world to Nigeria.
It is recollected that the expiring government, the Goodluck Jonathan administration was known for purchasing second-hand old trains, claiming Nigeria did not need new trains.
Trains introduced by President Jonathan
Trains introduced by President Jonathan

#WalkForChange: Buhari Support Org Accompanies Hashim To Turkish Hospital Management [Pictures]

 
The Buhari Support Organizations, (BSO) accompanied the Buharian Traveller, Suleiman Hashim, to pay a ‘Thank you” visit to the Management of the Nigerian Turkish Hospital in Abuja for supporting him with the last lap of his walk from Lagos to Abuja.
On hand to receive us were the Deputy Director of the Hospital, Dr. Atilla Emiroglu and Dr. Mohammed Abubakar.

The President-Elect Muhammadu Buhari Rejects DSS Offer of New CSO

Ahead of the May 29, inauguration date, President-elect, General Muhammadu Buhari has rejected moves by the Department of State Services (DSS), to replace his Chief Security Officer (CSO) that was assigned to him since his emergence as the presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) with a new hand.
It gathered from a credible source close the DSS that as soon as General Buhari emerged as President-elect, the Service hurriedly moved to replace his CSO, but met a brick wall as the President-elect vehemently rejected the offer which he viewed with suspicion and insisted that he would prefer to retain and continue with CSO AbdulRahman Mani as against having a new officer to be posted to him.
The Director-General of the DSS was believed to have gone to General Buhari to explain to him that based on his new position as President-elect, he was deserving of an officer with a higher rank to that of Mani. But General Buhari, a former Head of State and a military General, who understands the workings of the system, said there was nothing wrong in promoting Mani to the next rank to enable him qualify for a job he is already used to doing.
Accordingly and in line with the request of the President-elect, the Director-General of the DSS left and returned the following day with a letter approving the appointment of Mani as the substantive CSO to General Buhari.
NEWSPUNCH

Constitutional Amendment Details: Nigerian Senators Trying To Become More Powerful Than President, Get Life Pension, Immunity

President Goodluck Jonathan, on April 15th, gave reasons why he refused to assent the constitution amendment bill forwarded to him by the National Assembly even as some eminent lawyers backed his decision.
Raising about 13 grounds, President Jonathan in a letter entitled: “Re: Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Fourth Alteration Act, 2015,” questioned the power the National Assembly has to arrogate to itself the power to pass any constitution amended without the assent of the President.
He also picked holes in whittling down the power of the President, allowing the National Judicial Council, NJC, to appoint the Attorney-General of the Federation, separating the office of the Accountant-General of the Federation from that of the Federal Government, and limiting the period when expenditure can be authorized in default of appropriation from six months to three months, among others.
Leading lawyers, who endorsed the president’s action were Professor Itse Sagay (SAN), Chief Emeka Ngige (SAN), Mr Festus Keyamo and Mr Kayode Ajulo.
Shocked by the President’s letter, the National Assembly Conference Committee, comprising members of the Constitution Review Committee in both the Senate and the House of Representatives, yesterday, began a two-day retreat to look into the bill and the attendant consequence of the president’s action. It will come out with a definite position on the issue next week.
Mark stops senators from debating President’s letter
The President’s letter was read on the floor of the Senate during plenary yesterday by the Senate President, David Mark. But he stopped Senators from debating the President’s refusal to assent to the amended bill, when some senators, led by Senator Sadiq Yar’Adua, APC, Katsina Central, raised a Point of Order, seeking permission to that effect.
The President, in the letter also lamented what he termed as usurpation of powers of the executive by the legislature in the fourth alteration of the constitution.
Shortly after the Senate President finished reading the letter, Senator Abubakar Yar’Adua, APC, Katsina Central, raised a Point of Order, seeking that the Senate be allowed to debate the President’s letter.
He said: “I think it is important for us to discuss that letter and see whether there is need for us to consider the letter or not. I think he has raised very serious fundamental issues, especially in terms of our conscience as lawmakers and his own position as the chief executive officer of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. That is why I am raising this point or order.”
But the Senate President refused his request, saying he was earlier communicated by the Conference Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution, that it was holding a two-day retreat between yesterday and today, to discuss and take position on the president’s letter.
Mark said: “Obviously, this letter is not like any other normal letter. We can’t discuss the letter unless you have a copy of it. So, the first reaction is for me to make copies available to everybody. And you go and study it. And if you notice, there is an announcement also by the Constitution Review Committee that they are going to meet. So, that will straight away go to them. I agree with you that weighty issues have been raised. It’s a peculiar case, so everybody will be involved.”
                                                   Where lawmakers erred —Jonathan
buhari talk 
In the letter, Jonathan said that the two chambers of the National Assembly failed to meet requirements for altering Section 9 (3) of the 1999 Constitution.
“Section 4 of the Fourth Alteration Act, 2015 seeks to alter Section 9 of the 1999 Constitution by the insertion of a new subsection 3A, which dispenses with the assent of the President in the process of constitution amendment. However, this alteration can only be valid if the proposal was supported by votes of not less than four-fifths majority of all the members of each House of the National Assembly and approved by a resolution of the Houses of Assembly of not less than two-thirds of all the states as provided by Section 9 (3) of the 1999 Constitution.
“This is a fundamental requirement of the constitution and in the absence of credible evidence that this requirement of the constitution was met in the votes and proceedings of the National Assembly, it will be unconstitutional for me to assent to this Bill,” he explained.
Besides, the President said there were a number of provisions in the Act that altogether constitute flagrant violations of the doctrine of separation of powers enshrined in the 1999 Constitution and unjustifiably whittle down the executive powers of the federation vested in the president by virtue of Section 5 (1) of the 1999 Constitution.
Jonathan observed that the power vested in the President to withhold his assent to bills passed by the National Assembly was part of checks and balances contained in the constitution.He said Sub-section 5a of Section 58, which provides that the bill becomes law after the expiration of 30 days in the event that the president fails to signify the withholding of his assent, may be inappropriate.
“The provision appears not to have taken cognizance of the afore-mentioned variables, the vagaries inherent in the legislative process and the wisdom in requiring two-thirds majority to override the President’s veto.
“In the light of the above, I am of the view that the failure to signify assent by the President within the prescribed period of 30 days should rather be treated as dissent, which would require two-thirds majority to override.”
                                               Jonathan faults NASS over alteration
senate 
Jonathan also faulted the National Assembly over its alteration, seeking to limit the period when expenditure can be authorized in default of appropriation from the six months provided in the constitution to three months, saying: “I am of the view that this provision has the potential of occasioning financial hardships and unintended shut-down of government business, particularly where for unforeseen reasons and other exigencies in the polity, the National Assembly is unable to pass the Appropriation Act timeously.
“Our recent experiences with the process of passing the Appropriation Act do not justify the reduction of six-month time limit in the constitution,” he insisted.
The President also faulted Section 84a that created the new Office of Accountant General of the Federation distinct from the Accountant General of the Federal Government, saying it did not address the funding requirements for establishment of the office.
“It is necessary to clarify, for instance, who staffs and funds the office of Accountant- General of the Federation and from whose budget he will be paid since he serves the three tiers of government,“he stressed.
He also said it was important to state who will exercise oversight powers over the office, noting that the National Economic Council, which was mainly an advisory body, was now charged with the responsibility of recommending those to be appointed to the office of the Accountant-General.
The President equally faulted the National Assembly in separating the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation from the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General from the Commissioner for Justice in the respective states of the federation and also the provision for independence of the Office of Attorney General by guaranteeing tenure and funding.
He said as desirable as the alterations were, there were some provisions that violate the doctrine of separation of powers and also negate what he called “the age-long independence and absolute discretion that the office has enjoyed for centuries since its creation in the middle ages.”
He said the first setback was that the alteration was silent on who was the Chief Law Officer of the Federation, noting: “This is a serious lacuna, which may create implementation challenges.”
President has minor justification—Sagay
On the controversy, Professor Itse Sagay, SAN, said though the President has a minor justification in refusing to endorse the amendment in the 1999 Constitution, some of the sections he rejected would have been good for the country.
Sagay said: “There is the main issue of whether the President is really entitled to sign the constitution, that is the constitution could have been changed without him, that issue is not yet resolved and probably won’t be resolved until it gets to the Supreme Court because every constitutional change goes through a process of two thirds vote in the National Assembly and approval by state Houses of Assembly.
“So, it raises the question of after going through that process, is it still necessary to present it to the President for his signature. That issue is there but the way the people behave this time is as if they needed the President to vote.”
Speaking further, the legal icon said: “If you look at his reasons for refusing to endorse the amendment, his main reasons are that the executive powers are being depleted to the advantage of the National Assembly and the National Judicial Council.
“For example, he said the office of the Accountant-General was split into two. One for the federation and the other for the Federal Government. That is a very good thing. I do not know why he should be against that because the present Accountant-General of the Federation operates more as the Accountant-General of the Federal Government. It is usually unfair to other parts of the federation, that is why that position was made, it was a sensible provision.
“As for the National Judicial Council appointing the Attorney-General, I do not think it is a good idea. It is going too far because the Attorney-General exercises executive powers in the sense that he can decide to institute a criminal case and he can decide to end a criminal case. I think that should remain with the executive and not with the judiciary.
“As for meeting the provision of Section 9 (3), I do not know what he expects them (National Assembly) to meet. They have met the Two Thirds requirements. The only provision of the constitution which requires three quarter votes are those that affect human rights. These ones do not affect human rights as far as I know. I don’t see why he is complaining about Section 9(3).
All told, he has some minor justification but the bulk of what has been rejected would have been positive for the federation.”
President did the right thing —Ngige
On his part, Chief Emeka Ngige, SAN, said the president’s action was in order. He said: “My view is that I whole-heartedly support the President’s action by not signing the bill. It is only a fool that will append his signature to something that would make him look foolish. I am surprised that the National Assembly wanted the President to sign off his powers in the constitution amendment process.
“The President did the right thing and it is now left to be seen whether the legislators would override the President’s action. I am, however, in doubt that they will get the required number needed to do that as things stand now in the country. My advice is that they suspend the constitution amendment process until the next dispensation.”
                                                   Jonathan is correct —Keyamo
festus keyamo 
In like manner, Lagos lawyer, Mr. Festus Keyamo, backed the President on rejecting the constitution amendment bill. According to him, the National Assembly failed in attaching the votes and proceedings on the sitting that approved the clause to change the mode for constitution alteration.
He also sided with the President in rejecting the proposal to give the National Judicial Council the responsibility of appointing the attorney general, asserting that it breaches the doctrine of separation of powers.
He said: “I think the President is correct and he divided his objection into two. In the first one, he gave reasons he could not sign the issues dealing with healthcare, education and all that.
“In the second one, dealing with four-fifths requirement needed to alter the mode for constitution amendment is a special provision in the constitution and if you need to change the provision by which the constitution should be amended, you need a higher number than the normal two-thirds and the President said that they did not attach the votes and proceedings to show that that number was met. That was very fair by him. There is no evidence that you have met the requirements before sending it to me. So he is correct on that one.
“On the requirement for free education and all that, what the President is saying is that you cannot impose free healthcare on private hospitals and private schools; you should restrict it to government schools. So do you want people to start taking private schools to court? It should be restricted to government hospitals because you would otherwise destroy the spirit of free enterprise in the country.’’
On separation of Attorney General and Minister of Justice
“What the President said was that they would be infringing on the principle of separation of powers. For example, it would mean giving the judiciary the power to appoint the attorney general who is an executive member and don’t forget that the attorney general sits in the exco.
“You are now saying that the judiciary should appoint him or recommend him to the President for appointment subject to the approval of the Senate, so that appointment is coming from the judiciary whereas in the past the NJC only recommended judges.
“Now, the danger is that when a government fails in its anti-corruption war, you blame the president; meanwhile the person who is responsible for anchoring the anti-corruption war of the government is the attorney general who is not appointed by the government but may actually be destroying the anti-corruption war and yet the government cannot touch him.
“So it is a two-edged sword, but the government gets the consequence. So you could have a case where the attorney general can destroy the government’s anti corruption battle but the government cannot sack him.”
It’s constitutionalism in action—Ajulo
On his part, Mr Kayode Ajulo commended the president for using his discretion, saying this is constitutionalism in action.
“When you look at it very well, the president has the discretion to either sign the amendments or not. What the President has done is the right thing because this is constitutionalism in action. It is well inscribed in the law and if the President exercises his discretion, so be it. Either rightly or wrongly, it now lies with the Supreme Court to do the required.”
-Vanguard

Thursday 23 April 2015

Court Halts Fayose’s Impeachment, Sets Aside Omirin, APC Lawmakers Actions

A Federal High Court in Abuja on Thursday set aside all actions and activities of the impeached former Speaker of the Ekiti State House of Assembly, Dr. Adewale Omirin, and the All Progressives Congress lawmakers from November 21, 2014 till date, including the purported commencement of impeachment proceeding and notice alleging misconduct against the state Governor, Ayodele Fayose, and his Deputy, Dr. Olusola Eleka. Justice E. S. Chukwu gave the ruling on an exparte application in suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/361/15 filed by the Speaker of the state House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Dele Olugbemi, and six other Peoples Democratic Party lawmakers. The judge also granted plaintiffs in the suit leave to serve the originating summons on the defendants through newspaper advertisements. Olugbemi and six others had filed the suit, seeking an order of the court declaring the seats 19 lawmakers vacant having abdicated their functions since November 21, 2014 and also an Court halts Fayose’s impeachment, sets aside Omirin, APC lawmakers actions A Federal High Court in Abuja on Thursday set aside all actions and activities of the impeached former Speaker of the Ekiti State House of Assembly, Dr. Adewale Omirin, and the All Progressives Congress lawmakers from November 21, 2014 till date, including the purported commencement of impeachment proceeding and notice alleging misconduct against the state Governor, Ayodele Fayose, and his Deputy, Dr. Olusola Eleka. Justice E. S. Chukwu gave the ruling on an exparte application in suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/361/15 filed by the Speaker of the state House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Dele Olugbemi, and six other Peoples Democratic Party lawmakers. The judge also granted plaintiffs in the suit leave to serve the originating summons on the defendants through newspaper advertisements. Olugbemi and six others had filed the suit, seeking an order of the court declaring the seats 19 lawmakers vacant having abdicated their functions since November 21, 2014 and also an order restraining the police from aiding, abetting or assisting the lawmakers from carrying out any illegal act. Apart from Omirin and the APC legislators, also joined as defendants in the suit are the Inspector General of Police and the Independent National Electoral Commission. Hearing of the Motion on Notice has been adjourned till May 13. order restraining the police from aiding, abetting or assisting the lawmakers from carrying out any illegal act. Apart from Omirin and the APC legislators, also joined as defendants in the suit are the Inspector General of Police and the Independent National Electoral Commission. Hearing of the Motion on Notice has been adjourned till May 13.

Xenophobia And The United States Of Africa Project

The recent wave of xenophobic attacks in South African especially against fellow Africans is unfortunate, regrettable, and condemnable.
History will no doubt remember this killings, and the perpetrators will never be forgiven. This is because, Africans especially Nigeria played a very vital role in the fight against apartheid in South Africa. Nigeria has spent a lot and accommodated a lot of South Africans in the spirit of brotherhood and Africa’s liberation. Now it is South Africans that are attacking their fellow Africans, killing them and looting away their properties. It is awkward and irrational pay back gesture.
Xenophobia in it self, it is a barbaric thing of the past. No country, state, or nation can survive on it’s own. That was why Europeans despite their development had to smelt their differences and unite under the cover of European Union.
International organizations like UN, AU, WHO etc were created purposely to assist and help countries. Legally registered foreigners that pay taxes in a country are more important to that country that its criminal citizens. America is a country that accept all people. That is why an African-Americans, Arab-Americans, Latino-Americans etc, feels more of been Americans than their ancestral background. That is because, the US understands and harnesses the benefits in diversity and capabilities.
The realization of United States of Africa is vague and a mirage if xenophobia and tribal wars will continue among African states. How can we achieve a United States of Africa when South Africans don’t like Nigerians, when Nigerians don’t like Ghanaians, when Libyans don’t like Sudanese etc. Africa must come of age and start to deals with its problems using a local solution. The African Union should be strengthened and able to defend the interest of all Africans where ever they are.
I call on the South African government to protect all foreigners within its domain and to protect their properties also. The perpetrators of this xenophobic attacks should be brought to justice irrespective of their status.
The government should also apologies and compensate victims of the barbaric attacks – with assurance that such will never be allowed that happen again.

BREAKING: EFCC to Declare Former Borno Governor, Modu Sherrif​,​ Wanted

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission is set to declare a former governor of Borno State, Modu Sheriff, wanted for failing to honour the commission’s invitation.
Mr. Sheriff was summoned by the anti-graft agency to appear on Thursday at 10.a.m. for questioning ​on​ allegations ​of “misappropriation, embezzlement of funds and abuse of office while he was governor”.
However, ​a ​defiant Mr. Sheriff damned ​the ​EFCC’s invitation.
A source at the commission who wouldn’t want to be named because he was not authorised to do so​,​ said Mr. Sheriff’s failure to appear before the commission will automatically ​compel the commission to effect his arrest.
The source said the commission would have to first declare the ex-governor wanted and then move on to arrest him.
Multiple sources at the anti-graft agency had earlier told PREMIUM TIMES that should Mr. Sheriff fail to show up as directed, he would be declared wanted and then arrested.
Our sources said detectives were already on his trail and watching his movement to prevent him from fleeing.
Although the specific allegations against the former governor ​are​ unclear at this time, this newspaper gathered that the investigation is related with allegations that parts of the N300billion his administration received from the Federation Account between 2003 and 2011 may not have been judiciously spent.
The investigation began in 2012 and had been ongoing ever since, our sources said.
Mr. Sheriff ​governed​ Borno State on the platform of the defunct All Nigeria Peoples Party.
Before then, he was ​a ​senator between 1999 and 2003 on the ticket of the same party.
It remains unclear why Mr. Sheriff is being invited by the anti-graft agency at the end of an administration formed by his own party, the Peoples Democratic Party, which he joined only last year.
The spokesperson for the EFCC, Wilson Uwujaren, could not be reached for the commission’s moved on Mr. Sheriff.

Fear of Being Jailed: NNPC, Alison-Madueke Starts Refunding Unremitted $1.48bn

The Minister of Petroleum Resources Mrs. Diezani Alison-Madueke, on Wednesday disclosed that the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation has started refunding the $1.48bn unremitted fund into the Federation Account as recommended by an audit firm, PriceWaterHouse Coopers.
She however did not disclose how much has for far been refunded by the corporation.
She also denied reports that she was seeking the assistance of some highly-placed persons in order to escape prosecution for alleged corruption from the incoming administration of the President-elect, Muhammadu Buhari.
Alison-Madueke spoke with State House correspondents at the end of the weekly meeting of Federal Executive Council at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.
It will be recalled the Federation Account Allocation Committee had on Monday night constituted a committee to find out the reasons for the delay in the refund of the sum.
PriceWaterHouse Coopers had in the report of its forensic audit report of the corporation recommended that the NNPC should refund the amount to the Federation Account.
Alison-Madueke however explained that the unremitted fund was owed by the NPDC for a block that had been assigned from the NNPC to the NPDC.
She said, “The PriceWaterHouse Coopers forensic audit that was done few weeks ago in his recommendation mentioned that $1.48bn was owed by the NPDC for a block that had hitherto been assigned from the NNPC to the NPDC which is its subsidiary.
“They felt that the right process would be that the NPDC will refund that money to the Federation Account. The NPDC has apparently started those refunds and it is also in discussion with the NNPC and the DPR on same. So the refund has actually began.”
While saying that the payment was being done under her directive, she insisted that the sum was not missing but transferred by the NNPC to the NPDC.
The minister also denied media reports that she was reaching out to some prominent Nigerians, including a former military Head of State, Gen. Abdusalami Abubakar (retd.), to seek soft landing from the incoming government.
She said she had in the course of her job as minister met with elder statesmen across the country and wondered why her meeting with Abubakar would be singled out.
The minister said she could not be seeking for a soft landing because she was not aware that she had committed any crime.
She said, “I have not sought such assistance because I am not aware that I have been indicted of any crime that I will need a soft landing.
“Over the last four years, I have many times been unfortunately accused and libelled in so many malicious and vindictive ways.
“I have explained these things and pushed back robustly on these accusations and I have even gone to court on many of them. Yet, they keep being regurgitated.”

Nigerians Support President Jonathan Against ‘Greedy’ Senators #RejectConstitutionalChange

Civil activists are supporting president Goodluck Jonathan in rejection of last minute constitutional changes that will among other things give immunity to senators and life long pensions. Civil activist Femi Falana yesterday rejected the constitutional amendments designed solely to safeguard the law makers’ interests.
Other activists also raised their voices in supprts of Goodlcuk Jonathan against the senators:

President Jonathan has sued the national assembly over these changes.

Jonathan Takes National Assembly to Supreme Court over Constitution Amendment Bill

The Executive Arm of the Federal Government on Wednesday went to the Supreme Court asking the court to declare as a null the ‎passage of the proposed amendment of the constitution by the National Assembly.
The Attorney-General of the Federation, Mr. Mohammed Adoke, instituted the fresh suit with SC/214/2015 on behalf of the executive arm of government asking the court to nullify any attempt by the National Assembly to override the President’s veto powers.
In the suit, the executive arm argued that the bill was not passed by at least four-fifths majority of all members of each House of the National Assembly as stipulated in sections 48 and 49 of the Constitution.
The suit follows the crisis that had developed over President Goodluck Jonathan’s refusal to assent the fourth Alteration Bill of the Constitution. Instead, the President wrote to the National Assembly last week listing some grey areas that he said were contentious.
The National Assembly had threatened to override the President’s veto powers as it relates to the bill.
Meanwhile, human rights lawyer, Mr. Femi Falana has warned the National Assembly against passing the bill without looking critically at some of the arguments given by President Goodluck Jonathan.
Falana, who stated this in a statement on Wednesday, said if the National Assembly failed to review the grey areas as raised by the President before overriding his assent, it could result in legal issues that could be challenged.
Falana, who also criticised the refusal of President Jonathan to assent to the bill, recalled that the last alterations to the constitution sanctioned by the President in 2010 and 2011, were passed by the same two-thirds majority of the federal and state legislators recalling further how former President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Mr. Olisa Agbakoba, challenged an attempt by the National Assembly to amend the constitution without recourse to the President.
Falana stated: “In 2010, the National Assembly had purportedly empowered itself to amend the Constitution without the assent of the President of the Republic.
“The action was challenged in the Federal High Court by Olisa Agbakoba SAN, a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association. The court declared the amendment illegal and unconstitutional and proceeded to set it aside in toto.
“In view of the fundamental errors which have characterised the 4th Alteration to the Constitution, the National Assembly members should go back to the drawing table.
“They should have no difficulty in jettisoning the alteration of section 9 of the Constitution as it is the height of legislative dictatorship to amend the Constitution of a country without the assent of the President and the endorsement of the people via a referendum.
While the concern of the legislators for the rights of Nigerians to basic education and health is appreciated the inclusion of both rights in chapter four of the Constitution is unnecessary as both rights have been statutorily recognised.
“However, if the members of the National Assembly refuse to remove the objectionable provisions before overriding the veto of the President they would have engaged in a futile exercise which is likely to be challenged in a law court.‎
“Apart from the serious observations raised by the President some of the provisions of the Amendment completely negate national interests.
“Whereas majority of Nigerians have consistently demanded for the removal of immunity clause from the Constitution the amendment seeks to confer immunity on legislators in addition to the heads of the executive arm of government.
“Another objectionable proposition in the 4th amendment is the provision of pension for life for former leaders of the National Assembly.
“Indeed, one of the former speakers of the House of Representatives who will be a beneficiary of the largesse spent a few months in office and resigned for fear of impeachment.
“Another retired speaker who served for less than four years is barely 40 years old. The National Assembly should justify why Nigerians should pay pension for life to such legislators for rendering part time service in the parliament.” Source

Wednesday 22 April 2015

BREAKING: Gunmen Trail, Shoot Nasir El-Rufai Campaign Coordinator Dead

Gunmen  have killed a local campaign coordinator of Kaduna state governor-elect, Malam Nasir El-Rufai.
El-Rufai’s spokesperson, Samuel Aruwan disclosed  this  in a statement made available to newsmen in Kaduna.
According to Aruwan, the gunmen trailed Mr. Markus Ishaya to his village, Atuku Kasa, Atuku Ward of Jema’a local government area of the state. And shot him several times. He was the Governor-elect’s coordinator in Atuku Ward and did very well in mobilizing support.
Aruwan said “His family informed us that unknown gunmen stormed his residence and shot him several times.
“The men, two in number were well  armed and did not pick any property in his residence except carrying out the ungodly act.
“The Police have confirmed the incident. The Police have also visited the scene of the crime and have commenced investigation.
“While we appreciate their prompt action, our expectation is that the security agencies will fully investigate this killing and prosecute the perpetrators.
“Security agencies must adequately protect all Nigerians irrespective of their status and standing.”
Condoling the family, Malam El-Rufai who prayed for the soul of the deceased said “Our empathy and prayers go to the family of Mr. Markus Ishaya and the entire community over this callous murder and desecration of human life.
“May Almighty God grant his soul eternal rest and give his family and friends the fortitude to bear this painful loss.”
The killing of Ishaya brings to ten the number of members of the All Progressives Congress (APC) that have been killed in the state during the election campaign and its immediate aftermath.

Nigerians Port Lines Away From MTN As South African Giant Threatens Nigerians Over #BoycottSA

Nigerian customers have begun porting their numbers to other networks as South African mobile giant, MTN threatened Nigerians that if they actualized the boycott of the service 6000 Nigerians will lose their jobs and another 500,000 along the MTN food chain will go without meals.
Mohammed Keana, a civil activist pictured above went to Glo network today and immediately ported his phone number away from MTN. Thousands across the country and continent are similarly reducing or abandoning using MTN network, DSTV and other South African products and services.
Another Nigerian tweeted a promise to port away from MTN tomorrow:
Yet another Nigerian had illustrated his plan to burn his MTN lines and DSTV box earlier this week in the tweeted image:
burn mtn
As different countries protest xenophobia in South Africa by abandoning the country products and services with Ghana giving the nation a 5 day (from the 19th) ultimatum before boycotts, the South African government has been blamed for promoting the phenomenon with president Zuma’s son accused of directly suggesting the killing of foreigners and the nation’s small business minister saying this week that foreigners need to teach locals their trade secrets to stave off being looted.
Images from Protests in Kaduna Yesterday
boycott-sa
reject1 reject2 reject3
reject4

Impeachment: No Escape Route For Fayose – APC Elders

The Elders’ Forum in the Ekiti State chapter of the All Progressives Congress has declared that there is no escape route for the state Governor Ayo Fayose in the impeachment process initiated by 19 members of the state House of Assembly.
The body said Fayose has serially breached the Constitution, desecrated the esteemed office he occupies and should be ready to face the consequences of his actions.
The Publicity Secretary of Ekiti APC Elders Forum, Dr. Bayo Orire, who made the group’s position known on Tuesday, also warned the military and the police against being used to hinder the lawmakers from carrying out their constitutional functions.
Condemning the military for turning back the 19 APC lawmakers from entering Ado-Ekiti, the state capital on Tuesday, Orire said the party’s elder body was concerned about an alleged open partisanship of officers and men of the Nigerian Army on the matter.
He also said the police and the Army should not be watching helplessly for hoodlums to seize the whole state and interfere with the constitutional duties of the Assembly members.
Dr. Orire explained that the lawmakers should not be blamed for signing and forwarding an impeachment notice against Fayose, saying a responsible House of Assembly was not expected to look the other way when the chief executive was overstepping his bounds.
He said Fayose has violated the oath he swore to defend the Constitution and not do anything to infringe on the rule of law, urging the people of the state not to see the action of the lawmakers as an attack on the governor but to save the state from impunity and sliding into an “irredeemable dictatorship.” The APC elders’ spokesman maintained that whatever constitutional action taken by the 19 lawmakers remain legitimate, legal and binding since they have met and surpassed the two-third majority needed to remove an erring governor.

MTN Threatens Nigerians Of ‘Consequences’ of #BoycottSA; Says 6000 To Be Made Jobless

MTN Nigeria on Monday warned that should there be attacks on its facilities, it might be forced to close shop and 99 per cent of its over 6,000 workforce in the country, who are Nigerians, would be thrown into the labour market.
 It also said that calls for the boycott of its services were unjustified as such an action would affect its support chain, which could cause another 500,000 Nigerians to lose their means of livelihood. The company stated this in Lagos some hours after two groups protested in its Abuja and Benin offices against the killing of foreigners in its home country, South Africa.
According to the Corporate Service Executive, MTN Nigeria, Mr. Wale Goodluck, featured, there are only 12 expatriates working for the company in the country, compared to a workforce of 6,000 Nigerians.
Read full on Punch

Yobe Governor Ibrahim Geidam Accused Of Terrorizing, Abducting Imam – BBC

Yobe state governor Ibrahim Geidam accused of using security operatives to abduct an Imam who preached against him before the recently conducted gubernatorial elections.
The Imam, Malam Abubakar Ciroma had earlier told his congregation to vote for General Muhammadu Buhari to save Nigeria.
It was when ahead of the governorship elections he did not likewise preach for the governor but rather preached against him for gross misappropriation of state funds that governor Ibrahim Geidam reportedly had the Imam abducted.
BBC reports that his wife complained of his arrest.
 
 BBC said today:
In Yobe State in northeastern Nigeria, the family of a teacher of Islam have accused the state government of arresting the teacher and continue to maintain it .
Malam Abubakar Ciroma’s family alleged that the government has taken this step after the preacher t spoke election eve to his congregation, calling on the people and state to not re-elect Governor Ibrahim Gaidam.
One woman teacher  told the BBC that since the detention , they again heard , and still has not been seen.
Family teacher.
Abdullahi Bego said security cannot comment about the arrest teacher.

CHAI! Tinubu To Kashamu: We Are Not In The Same Class; Go, Face Your Charges In US

 Lagos—National Leader of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and former governor of Lagos State, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has blasted controversial businessman and Peoples Democratic Party, PDP senator-elect, Prince Buruji Kashamu.
Tinubu said he does not need praises from Kashamu, saying they are not in the same class.
Kashamu had in an advertisement praised Tinubu over the outcome of the 2015 general elections.
The APC national leader asked Kashamu, a PDP financier, to make a trip to the United States of America to answer drug charges against himself.
“Please keep your peace until you make your trip to the USA as a Senator-elect. Upon your return we can then have a conversation. We can then proceed with your repudiation of the PDP with a promise that you will stop corrupting and fouling the political system,” Tinubu said in a statement signed by his media adviser, Sunday Dare.
“Our attention has been drawn to the recently advertised letter by Mr. Buruji Kashamu to Asiwaju Bola Tinubu in which he described Tinubu in superlative terms and as his role model. Kashamu needs to stop this cynical fawning. It will not work.
“The days of false adulation are gone in Nigerian politics. Fake praise singers like Kashamu will find that their particular craft is no longer in vogue. During this election cycle, their practice has dramatically turned from the way things are to how it used to be.
“Henceforth, there will be consequences for the positions a politician takes and the words they utter.
“Politicians will no longer be able to change direction and loyalties as if they were changing clothes. Those in politics must know that responsibility and accountability shall now follow them. One can no longer walk both sides of the street at the same time. In case Kashamu has not noticed, the politics of principle defeated the politics of posturing.
“That Kashumu undermined the democratic process by buying his victory does not mean he is part of the new Nigeria. He is merely an isolated vestige of a dying past. The man is an extinct species the realization of which will soon dawn on him.
“For him to liken himself to Bola Tinubu is for a small rut to call itself a mountain. For Kashamu to call Tinubu a role model is Kashamu’s admission that he does not know the meaning of the term. There are no grounds for comparison. There is only contrast. Tinubu has sacrificed years trying to bring democracy to Nigeria. He struggled in opposition to the powers that be. Without this, at times, lonesome fight and singular determination, the great change in Nigerian politics would not have happened as it did. TInubu is an architect of democracy. Kashamu is a failed demolisher of that which Tinubu has strived to build. Under Kashamu’s designs, our elections would be a wholly mercantile undertaking.
“Meanwhile, Kashamu has blown wherever the prevailing winds took him. He stood for nothing and sacrificed nothing except the people’s welfare.

“This same Kashamu rained insults on former President Obasanjo in a vicious campaign of calumny. Kashamu’s party, PDP sponsored defamatory documentaries full of lies and innuendos against me, General Muhammadu Buhari and other leaders of APC. Please keep your peace until you make your trip to the USA as a Senator-elect. Upon your return we can then have a conversation. We can then proceed with your repudiation of the PDP with a promise that you will stop corrupting and fouling the political system.
“That Kashamu would deign to compare himself with Tinubu is a distasteful insult to Tinubu and to anyone who knows Nigerian politics. If he has any sense of propriety, Kashamu should retract the corrupt missive and apologize for this latest lie to the public.”
“Kashamu in a factory of incoherent mischief aimed at achieving selfish goals. Before the election, Tinubu was his arch-enemy. Now he seeks to be the prodigal son returned home. This scam will fail.
“Kashamu may be prodigal but he is no political son of Tinubu. Kashamu’s political lineage tracks to people like Bode George and President Jonathan. He should direct his encomiums to these men who are his true role models. They need his contrived affections more than Tinubu does,’’ the statement added.

BOMBSHELL: Gov Akpabio, Akwa Ibom REC Caught Redhanded By INEC HQ With 500k Fake Voters [Documents]

The Akwa Ibom State Governor Godswill Akpabio and the State Resident Electoral Commissioner Mr. Austin Okojie are currently in serious dilemma on the best way to ‘clean up’ the embarrassing fallout from the results of the April 11 governorship election in the State declared by the State INEC Returning Officer, Prof. James Ekpoke.
A copy of the Summary of Accredited Voters which was forwarded to the INEC headquarters, and obtained by us through a credible source at the INEC headquarters shows that contrary to the 996,071 votes declared by Prof. Ekpoke as the total number of votes which the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, Udom Emmanuel allegedly polled to defeat his closest rival, Umana Okon Umana of the All Progressives Congress (APC), the total number of accredited voters captured by the Electronic Card Readers in Akwa Ibom state stood at 647,215.
However, based on the copy of the summary of the controversial result which the State INEC Returning Officer, Prof. James Epoke used in declaring the results of the election, and which was also forwarded to INEC headquarters, the figure penned down as the total number of registered voters stood at 1,548,531 while 1,158,624 was given as the total number of accredited voters.
SEE DOCS
IMG_12072292259978 IMG_12031083501920
The official at the INEC headquarters who mailed the original copy of the document revealing the total number of accredited voters as captured by the Electronic Card Readers disclosed that there has been several questions arising from what he described as the alarming discrepancies in the results declared in Akwa Ibom State.
“To be very honest with you, the PDP in Akwa Ibom and our oga who is the REC there did not do their homework well. And unless they look for a way to block the alarming loopholes, they would end up dragging their names in the mud. As a Resident Electoral Commissioner, you saw that the Chairman of the Commission, Prof Attahiru Jega had, just in one glance during the declaration of the presidential election spotted discrepancies in the result coming from this same Akwa Ibom state, where you presided over as REC, and had told the Returning Officer to go back and sort it out, yet, you didn’t learn.
What would it have cost you to relax, call all the parties you had worked with to declare this controversial result and then work all through the night to ensure that you allocate the figures perfectly in such a way that the total number of accredited voters as captured and presented by the card readers corresponds with the results you declared?. Right now, even if you were to tell it to my 3 years old daughter, how would you go about explaining to her that almost the same margin the President used in winning the election in Akwa Ibom state is the same one the PDP candidate used in defeating the closest contender?
Where is the room for the decline in the number of votes due to outbreak of violence that reportedly marred the voting process in the State? Or would you say that people will still stay back to vote after gunshots have been fired and people scampered away for safety? How about the voters’ apathy that was recorded nationwide, did your figures reflect that? Check out the results declared by some other states and you would find that the margin can never be that big like what you have in your state.
These are the places we at the Commission believe the election was free and fair. But then, most of these shocking revelations will be made at the tribunals that have just been constituted. I have worked in this Commission for over 15 years now and this are just elementary issues for some of us. That una Akwa Ibom state na real abracadabra state, I swear. ” The source at INEC Headquarters stated. Meanwhile, we can report authoritatively that the reason for the delay in the declaration of the results for the elections into the Akwa Ibom State House of Assembly was a fallout of the inability of the State Resident Electoral Commissioner to perfectly allocate figures to each of the candidates vying for the election in a way that they do not contradict the overall result declared for the governorship polls.
It would be recalled that a mild drama played out during the declaration of the Presidential poll as the INEC Chairman, Prof. Attahiru Jega had to stop the announcement of the result for Akwa Ibom state and consequently asked the Returning Officer for the State to go back and sort out the discrepancies noticed in the results.
Thousands of people protested in the State capital on Sunday 12th April, 2015 in response to the wide malpractice and violence that characterised the elections. The protest disrupted traffic flow in Uyo for hours. The police has so far confirmed the killing of 3 persons during the elections in the State.
Both local and foreign observers have faulted the elections in the State as falling below acceptable standards. In separate statements, the American Embassy in Nigeria and the European Union Observer Mission said elections in the State was deeply flawed.
The Nigerian Civil Society Situation Room led the Director, Policy and Legal Advocacy Center (PLAC), Mr. Clement Nwankwo, has equally called for a total cancellation of elections in the State.

Tuesday 21 April 2015

Duke: PDP Lost ‘Cos Its Leaders Were So Arrogant

Donald Duke, former governor of Cross River state, has attributed the woeful performance of the Peoples Democratic party (PDP) in the 2015 general election to the arrogance of the party’s leaders. Speaking on Monday during a Channels Television programme, he said the party’s leaders were so arrogant and deified that that they missed numerous opportunities to top the rot in its fold. “The arrogance had it reached its zenith when five governors, five PDP governors, threatened to leave the party; and the leaders said ‘let them go’ simply because they were the governors who would be against the renomination of the president,” Duke said. But he admonished the party to take its losses in its stride and focus on regaining lost ground, as a virile opposition is crucial to the sustenance of democracy. “It has to go back and re-strategise – a number of things have gone wrong. First of all, we need to have an opposition in the country. It would be very sad to allow the PDP to just fizzle out. That would be wrong, not just for the party,” he said. “For the country, we need a strong opposition party to keep those in authority on their toes. We need to ask ourselves very salient questions; where did we go wrong? “PDP, in some sections of the country, offended the electorate: the handling of certain issues. The handling of Boko Haram was very poor, the economic situation in the north was not seen to being addressed, the extravagance of public office holders, the proliferation of private jets, acting as if this party would never end. “All these abused the sensitivities of a large section of the population. It was just a way of live for so many people. The divide was strictly between the rich and the poor. The middle class was eradicated; all that has to be addressed. “You need to get over the psychological trauma of the defeat. They’ve been in power of an office for 16 years, they need to consolidate – the base of the PDP now is largely in the southsouth and southeast – consolidate from there and re-grow.” He urged the PDP leadership got to go back and ask what went wrong in some states and then prepare for the next election. “Taking over from an incumbent is a very difficult thing, but you just have to wait and hope for the opportunity – it could take another 16 years for them to come back to the centre,” he said. “PDP has about 10 states, when this is all over; it’s a good place to start from. They need to redesign the party completely. Don’t forget what we now see as the APC was an evolution of ANPP at the beginning and the PDP, which were two formidable parties in the country. “PDP needs to re-evolve and re-strategise to get there. I do hope it doesn’t fizzle out. I’m quite concerned and disappointed that a number of people have jumped ship. They would come back frustrated in due cause.”

Jonathan Not Like Gbagbo, Says Ouattara

Alassane Ouattara, president of Cote d’Ivoire, has commended President Goodluck Jonathan for accepting the outcome of the March 28 election, saying that through the action, his Nigerian counterpart saved the country from a civil war. Recalling his experience when Laurent Gbagbo, former president of Ivory Coast, who refused to concede the 2010 election in his country, Ouattara said the action resulted in a four-month civil war that claimed 3,000 people. Gbagbo was eventually forced out of office after he was captured at a bunker in the presidential mansion. At the time, Ouattara formed a parallel government, operating from a private hotel within the country. The Ivorien president also described Jonathan as a model to other West African leaders. “You know that about five years ago, Cote d’Ivoire had election and I won the election and the former president decided not to leave office,” he told journalists during his visit to Aso Rock on Monday. “This brought the civil war and 3,000 people were killed. We were put in a hotel for protection by the United Nations for four and a half months. We were there without food because the hotel was guarded by the president’s men. “It was only after four and a half months of imprisonment in that hotel that finally we were able to leave the hotel; after the former president quit and finally left office for me. “I am saying this to stress that what happened in Nigeria is a lesson to all of us. Please accept my admiration.” Ouattara further congratulated Muhammadu Buhari, Nigeria’s president-elect, on his victory, saying: “On May 29, there is going to be inauguration and handover to the president-elect, President Buhari,” he said. “People are more important than power and Mr. President, my good friend, I am not surprised about what you did and I wanted to congratulate you and congratulate the Nigerian people.” After departing from the presidential villa, Ouattara held a private meeting with Buhari at the presidential wing of the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport Abuja. Addressing reporters after the meeting, he congratulated Nigerians for the outcome of the election. Responding, Buhari thanked Ouattara for the visit and commended Jonathan for exhibiting statesmanship. “Thank you very much for this visit and for taking time to congratulate,” he said. “I would like to particularly congratulate President Jonathan for his statesmanship.”

Nigerians Threaten To ‘Bite’ S’Africa After 24hrs

Nigerian protesters on Monday besieged the South African high commission in Abuja to demand an end to xenophobic attacks on foreigners in South Africa. Numbering about 500, the protesters gave South Africa 24 hours to stop the killings or face the wrath of Nigerians. “If Nigeria is pushed to the wall, it will bite,” one of them said. Speaking with TheCable, Deji‎ Adeyanju, coordinator of the protest, argued against retaliation by Nigerians, but urged the South African government to stop the killings forthwith. “We want a situation in which the South African government will take decisive action against the killings‎,” he said. “The businesses of Nigerians are being threatened and it seems South Africans are celebrating now that foreigners are leaving. We will not retaliate. “We want to use‎ this protest to tell South Africa we are their friends. We stood by them during the apartheid era. However, we feel South African government is supporting the killings. We don’t want South Africans to be attacked.‎” However, another leader of the protest, Tolu Ebun, disagreed with Adeyanju, saying “If Nigeria is pushed to the wall it can bite,” and added “We give South Africa 24 hours to stop the killings‎ or…” Adewale Fawe, a protester, restated Ebun’s position, saying “We can retaliate. South Africa cannot bear the weight of Nigeria.” The atmosphere was charged as protesters took turns to ventilate their opinions. Even the presence of the representative of the South African high commiss‎ioner, Thembe Sosonwan smouldered nationalist feelings among the protesters who sang the national anthem loudly. Addressing the protesters, Sosonwan assured them of his government’s commitment to ending the bloodshed. “We South Africans are proud of our Nigerians brothers and sisters,” he said. “These things that are happening in South Africa are not acceptable. We assure you that the South African government is committed to bringing these things to a close.” According to reports, the xenophobic attacks in South Africa‎ have cost Nigerians resident in the country about N21 million. The first Nigerian to be attacked was a mechanic, whose workshop with 10 cars and all the tools inside was destroyed by some South Africans on Friday. The Nigerian government has said it will evacuate its citizens from the country if the attacks persist. There are about 800, 000 Nigerians living in South Africa‎.

APC: Buhari Hasn’t Picked Any Cabinet Member

The All Progressives Congress (APC) has urged Nigerians to disregard the speculations concerning the appointment of ministers and the zoning of offices under the incoming Buhari administration. In a statement issued in Abuja on Monday by its national publicity secretary, Lai Mohammed, the party said there was no truth to anything that has been dished up by the “hyperactive rumour mill” concerning the issues of appointment, especially the zoning of the national assembly’s principal positions and other offices. It said that in the true tradition of the APC, all issues of public interest will be handled transparently and conveyed to Nigerians through the usual communication channels. ”No appointments have been made and no offices have been zoned. The main concern of our party at the moment is to ensure a smooth transition and to hit the ground running, in the overall interest of the long-suffering people of Nigeria,” APC said. “At the appropriate time, Nigerians will be informed of the appointments made and the offices zoned.”

Bobbi Kristiana Is Awake,Says Bobby Brown

Bobbi Kristiana, the ailing daughter of celebrated American music rapper, Bobby Brown, has regained consciousness. Brown on Saturday night announced the good news of his daughter who has been on medically induced coma for over a month. He made the announcement while performing at Verizon Theatre in Dallas, United States of America. He told the stunned audience: “Bobbi is awake. “She is watching me.” As the crowd went wild, Brown didn’t elaborate on whether she had fully regained her consciousness. A family source told America-based Peoples magazine: “As far as I know there has not been change. We are still hoping and praying that God will perform a miracle. We are leaving it in God’s hand.” Kristians was found unresponsive in a bathtub in late January 2015. She has since remained in a medically induced coma. Despite all efforts by the family and team of medical practitioners to revive her back to life, all seems not yielding any positive result yet.

Very Few Of My Contemporaries Are Still Alive – Olu Maintain

Olu Maintain of Yahooze fame is back again. The artiste has revealed that most of his contemporaries are no longer active in the music industry. According to Maintain, the only person he would consider his contemporary and who is still active is 2face Idibia. Maintain revealed that the ability to come from years back and be able to remain a force is his biggest challenge so far. The artiste’s last set of singles were Ayekaye and Nawti.

Bale, Benzema, Modric All Out For Three Weeks

Real Madrid have confirmed that forward Gareth Bale has suffered a leg injury that is likely to keep him out of action for up to three weeks. The Welshman left the field inside the opening four minutes of Los Blancos’ 3-1 win over Malaga on the weekend, but the full extent of the damage was not fully known. It was feared by some that Bale may miss the remainder of the season, but Madrid have allayed fears by revealing that the injury is not too serious. “Following tests carried out on Gareth Bale at the Sanitas La Moraleja Hospital by the Real Madrid Medical Services, he has been diagnosed with a muscle injury in his left soleus. His progress will be monitored,” a club statement read. Spanish publication, AS, reports that the world’s most expensive player could be back in action for Madrid’s trip to Sevilla in early May, although he will miss the crucial Champions League quarter-final second-leg tie against city rivals, Atletico Madrid, this week. Fellow midfielder, Luka Modric, also limped off during the straightforward victory at the Bernabeu, althoug some report yet been given on the Croatian’s knee injury.

Court Affirms ICPC’s Powers To Declare Former NSCDC Deputy Commandant Wanted

A Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, headed by Justice Evoh Chukwu, has affirmed that the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission never infringed on Mbuotidem Daniel Akpan Edike’s fundamental human rights by declaring him wanted on the pages of newspapers. Akpan Edike, who was a Deputy Commandant of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps had sought an order of the court seeking to declare the publication purportedly declaring him wanted by the commission as a breach of his own fundamental right to liberty, in which he had also sought N10 million in damages against the commission. At the resumed hearing of the matter in which the trial judge delivered a ruling, counsel to the applicant Catherine Anene, and counsel to the respondent, O. G. Iwuagwu, readopted their addresses having elapsed the duration period before ruling, as stipulated by the constitution. The applicant in the suit instituted against the commission had earlier argued that the commission breached his fundamental rights, as he was not properly invited for investigation before ICPC declared him wanted in a newspaper advertorial. Counsel to the commission had argued that the commission invited the applicant through his workplace (NSCDC) only for the corp office to write back to the commission informing it that the applicant under investigation had absconded from work without leave. The applicant was said to have requested for a study leave, which was not approved, but then went ahead. Even at that, the ICPC sent another invitation to a business address linked to the culprit, but his lawyers said the letter was sent wrongly. Therefore the commission took the pain to send another through his lawyers, which was acknowledged in 2013. The trial judge in his ruling, averred that the anti corruption agency having provided the court with sufficient evidence in support of its invitations sent to the applicant, it was clearly obvious that the respondents (ICPC and its Chairman) “did everything humanly possible to invite the applicant” for investigation into a petition against him. On this premise, Justice Chukwu ruled in favour of the commission, ordering the applicant to bear the cost of the litigation in the sum of N50,000 to the commission.

Skye Bank Charges Customers On SME

Over 200 customers and business partners in the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise sector attended the South East edition of Skye Bank’s SME seminar held recently in Onitsha, Anambra State. Themed: “Nurturing Businesses for Growth,” the bank described the seminar as part of its contributions towards developing the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise sector of the Nigerian economy. While delivering his remark, the bank’s Regional Director for South East I, Dr. Charles Udogu, said MSME was an important growth driver in any economy, warning key economic players in the nation’s polity not to neglect the sector. Dr. Udogu said: “Having identified the gap in the SME sector, Skye Bank organized this seminar to bridge this gap through the Bank’s business seminar series.” Speaking in the same vein, Ayo Olojede, the Head of Small Business Group of Skye Bank, disclosed that the Bank was coming up with solutions that would help to minimize the cost of doing businesses for small business owners. Olojede, however, warned: “If you want to access a loan, there are some simple but fundamental requirements the bank will expect – like a business plan, cash flow projections and basic business skills to determine the viability of the business and ways of partnering with customers to deliver value.” Commenting on the seminar, she said it was organized to enlighten the bank’s customers on areas of managing their cash flow and other areas of business operations among other issues. In his keynote speech, the Managing Director of Dilimson Holdings Limited, George Umobi, charged participants to confront challenges faced in the course of growing their businesses and charged them to seize the opportunity Skye bank presented to them and make the best of it. The seminar was commended by the participants whose questions on different issues concerning Skye Bank Plc and the banking industry were promptly addressed by the bank’s representatives. The next edition of the Skye Bank Plc SME Seminar takes place in the South-Western part of the country in May.